an opportunity to cultivate character traits that would allow students to respectfully engage with and learn from others when discussing contentious topics
What does it mean to be a good thinker? Recent research suggests that acknowledging you can be wrong plays a penting role.
I had these studies in mind a few months ago when I was chatting with a history professor about a class she was teaching to first-year students here at Wake Forest University. As part of my job as a psychology professor who researches character - basically, what it means to be a good individu - I often talk to my colleagues about how our teaching can develop the character of our students.
In this case, my colleague saw her class as an opportunity to cultivate character traits that would allow students to respectfully engage with and learn from others when discussing contentious topics. Wanting to learn about and understand the world is a distinctive human motivation. As teachers, we want our students to leave college with the ability and motivation to understand and learn more about themselves, others and their world. She wondered: Was there one characteristic or trait that was most important to cultivate in her students?
I suggested she should konsentrasi on intellectual humility. Being intellectually humble means being open to the possibility you could be wrong about your beliefs.
But is being humble about what you know or don't know enough?
I now think my recommendation was incorrect. It turns out good thinking requires more than intellectual humility - and, yes, I see the irony that admitting this means I had to draw on my own intellectual humility.
One reason for my konsentrasi on intellectual humility was that without acknowledging the possibility that your current beliefs may be mistaken, you literally can't learn anything new. While being open to being wrong is generally quite challenging - especially for first-year university students confronting the limits of their understanding - it is arguably the key first tahap in learning.
But another reason for my response is that research on intellectual humility has exploded in the past 10 years. Psychologists now have many different ways to assess intellectual humility. Social scientists know that possessing a high tingkat of intellectual humility is associated with multiple positive outcomes, like having more empathy, more prosocial behavior, reduced susceptibility to misinformation and an increased inclination to seek compromise in challenging interpersonal disagreements.
If you want to konsentrasi on one trait to promote good thinking, it seems that intellectual humility is hard to beat. Indeed, researchers, including those in my own lab, are now testing interventions to promote it among different populations.
